Same story, different day. Every time there is an act of mass murder, the same debate always pops up. Namely, neurotypicals – used here as meaning not mentally ill – want to know how they can protect themselves from the dreaded neuroatypicals. People with mental illness are categorically seen as guaranteed time bombs waiting to go off. Are there some mentally individuals that will lash out because of disordered cognitions? Yes. Are there many more that just wish to live their lives free of the pressures of a neurotypical elite and majority? Also yes. Bad things happen to good people every day. A free society will never be able to protect themselves fully, but they can ensure that the playing field is level.
What dystopian universe exists in which human beings can merely allege wrongdoing and have another’s life ruined without any form of due process? This one. An uncivilized people waste no time in circling the waters once the prospect of blood has been raised. The elite, who believe themselves elevated because of their intelligence and power, partake in this sadistic game, wasting no time in throwing others under the bus for the promise of even the most minuscule gains. The commoner gains disproportionate power in their endeavor to bring down those unlike them through simple allegation. Finally, the actual process of law and justice is never conducted as popular opinion goes looking for victims, regardless of truth. If this doesn’t sound frightening, you must be aloof to the shifting reality of the world around us. Innocence is presumed false and guilt known to be true.
Liberal elites would like us to believe that no person is born to hate, but that bigotry is rather a learned behavior. I disagree. At some point in human history, man became woken to the fact that there were others unlike him. In our first days, we learn to associate family with non-family. Adopted children learn that their features surely did not come from their “parents.” Those without become envious of those with. So on and so forth. The second a difference is recognized between human beings, they begin to calculate the silent war that will one day grow hot. Man is not born to love; man is born to hate.
I am skeptical of any so-called alliance bewteen neurotypicals and psychopaths. While I have written before on the preposterous nature of such an alliance – as it makes a fool out of both the psychopath and the neurotypical – I believe that such an alliance is impossible anyway. That does not mean that there cannot be peace between the two groups, but as with any partition of the human condition, the haves will fight the have-nots and vice versa. We see this all the time with partitions. The wealthy exploit the poor. The poor seek legislation to limit the wealthy. Those that are sick want the resources of the healthy. Those that are healthy are only willing to help the sick that “deserve it.” So on and so forth. Whenever a partition exists, strife and consternation are sure to follow. Why then would a partition between those with teeth and those without be any different?
People want to believe that malice only lives in the heart of the antisocial. The truth is, that whenever two groups exist, malice will find a way into the minds of all. Whether it is heterosexual versus homosexual, transgender against cisgender, or Christian versus Muslim, arbitrary divides will cause hatred to swell within the hearts of anyone. I would be foolish to suggest that the antisocial is a pleasant person, however the very definition of the condition begets an interesting observation. Since the antisocial is opposed to the rights of others, nearly everyone is in their outgroup, and this implies that the antisocial is equal opportunity with their malice. Which would you rather encounter: one who claims to be good and acts otherwise or one that never claimed to be pure to begin with?